Shrimad Bhagavad Gita-Proof

Shrimad Bhagavad Gita is called the crown jewel among all the scriptures, but who is the narrator of the deepest knowledge mentioned in this great book (granth)? What is the form of that Giver of knowledge? Nobody knows this in a true sense. Had they known it, where was the need of making various different commentaries on the Gita? On one hand Krishna is said to be complete with 16 celestial degrees and on the other hand he is shown in the Copper Age complete with 8 celestial degrees. It is also said that Krishna narrated the Gita at the end of the Copper Age. Then, was the sinful Iron Age devoid of celestial degrees established through the Gita? When Shri Krishna gave knowledge, he had stopped the course of time. Time cycle is such a thing that can’t be stopped. Just like it is impossible to stop the revolving earth, similarly, time can’t be stopped either. The true secret of the Gita just remained a secret because of these kinds of dualistic ideas. After all, who is the narrator of the true secret of the Gita? It is the Giver of the knowledge of the Gita Himself. The proof of this has also been mentioned in the Gita itself, that the Creator of the Gita is ajanmaa, abhoktaa and akartaa. Because of this svadharma (religion of the self) is established. According to the scriptures, the worship of Shri Krishna with a child like intellect is shown in the form of a child in the temples as well as homes. Well, how can someone with a child like intellect explain the deep knowledge of the Gita? ……..

These points are proved with the help of many facts and shlokas from the Gita.

Factual proofs

Proved with the shlokas of the Gita

Factual proofs :-

1. Krishna isn’t God at all. He is in fact a deity. God is beyond celestial degrees whereas Krishna is complete with 16 celestial degrees.

2. It is written in the Gita, ‘Bhagvaanuvac’ i.e. spoken by God. Had Krishna given the knowledge of the Gita, it would have been mentioned ‘Krishna-uvaac’. However, ‘Krishna-uvaac’ is written nowhere.

3. The knowledge of the Gita has always been called ‘knowledge of Brahm’, ‘God’s song’ or ‘moral speech’. It has never been called ‘Shri Krishna’s knowledge’. It is because there is no mention of knowledge being given by Krishna in any shloka of the Gita.

4. Bhagwad Gita itself means the song of God, which has been spoken by God directly. This is why the word ‘Bhagvaanuvaac (words of God)’ is present only in the Gita. ‘Krishnauvaac (words of Krishna)’ hasn’t been mentioned anywhere. Even if the word ‘Krishna’ has been mentioned anywhere in the Gita, it isn’t for the deity Shri Krishna, rather it addresses God. Just like God has been referred to as ‘Madhusudan (slayer of the demon Madhu)’, ‘Rishikesh (Lord of the indriyaan)’, etc. in the same way, He has also been called ‘Krishna’. It is because the word ‘Krishna’ means to attract. Just like the knowledge of the Gita has attracted the people of every religion, similarly, it is only God who attracts everyone towards Himself. Not the people of all the religions are attracted by Krishna.

5. The word ‘Bhagwan’ is translated as ‘the Supreme Personality’, who is the Supreme Lord, there is nobody above Him.
It is also said in the Upanishads:
‘Yo devaanaam prabhavashcobhavashca vishvadhiipo rudro maharshih. Hiranyagarbham janayaamaasa puurvam sa no buddhayaa shubhayaa sanyunaktu’
He, the Omniscient Rudra, the Creator of all deities and the One who gives them their powers, the Support of the world, He who gave birth to Hiranyagarbha in the beginning, please bestow us with a pure intellect.

Shri Krishna is never called Rudra. Mahadev alone is called Rudra.

6. Shwetashwataropanishad- ‘Sah kaaranam karanaadhiipaadhipah. Asya janitaa na kashcit adhipah ca na’
He Himself is the cause for creation and He is the Lord of the lords of natural instruments but He neither has a creator (originator) nor a master.

Shri Krishna’s creators i.e. parents are shown. However, Mahadev’s parents aren’t shown. In fact, the entire world considers and worships Him in the form of Ardhanareeshwara i.e. mother and father.

7. Atharvshir Upanishad-‘Yo vai rudrah sah bhagwan yah ca tejah tasmai vai namonamah’
He, who is Rudra is God, He is the Supreme Light and we bow before Him again and again.
It is said in the Yajurveda, ‘Om namo bhagvate rudraye’, which means salutations to Rudra, who is God (the supreme personality of Ishwar).
The word ‘Bhagwan’ hasn't been used for any other deity except for Shiva-Shankar Mahadev in the Vedas and Upanishads. As the human beings started giving clarifications of scriptures, people started using the word ‘Bhagwan’ for many deities and now they designate even human beings as ‘Bhagwan’.

8. The one who gives the knowledge is higher than the knowledge itself. It is said, ‘svadeshe puujyate raja, vidvaan sarvatra puujyate’ [meaning] a king is just worshiped in his country, but a scholar is worshipped in the entire world. Then, why didn’t the people belonging to all the religions accept Shri Krishna? In fact, the knowledge of the Gita has been considered the best by all.

9. It is said, Krishna fought the righteous battle in order to gain victory over irreligiousness. Vishnu incarnated many times to destroy the irreligious ones. But continuously fighting the foreign irreligious invaders for 2500 years, those belonging to the Ancient Religion, be it the Marathas or Rajputs or ordinary Bharatwasis, all of them have raised slogans of ‘Har Har Mahadev’ or ‘Eklingji’ i.e. Shiva-Shankar Bholenath alone. The Bharatwasis always remember Mahadev to gain victory over any kind of unrighteousness. Nobody ever worshiped Krishna or Vishnu or raised slogans of their names before battles. Then, how can Shri Krishna be given the credit of destroying unrighteousness?

10. It is believed, our words and our actions should be one but both, the words and actions of Shri Krishna seem conflicting. Krishna, who is born from a womb, calls himself unborn. The knowledge of becoming detached forever is given in the Bhagwad Gita whereas the character of Krishna is always shown to be that of attachment.

11. Lust has been called the greatest enemy in the Gita, not Duryodhan or Dushasan. One Mahadev alone is praised as the one who burnt lust into ashes. Kamdev isn’t a human being, but it is about the desires of the mind. Only the one who can burn them can give the knowledge of destroying them.

12. In the Gita, there is the knowledge of loving God alone and performing worldly actions while being detached whereas the life story of Krishna gives birth to attachment and love in the world. Due to following this very character, the kings also started marrying many queens. Had they followed the character of Mahadev according to the knowledge of the Gita, there would be the joyful pure household path that follows the belief ‘ek naari sadaa brahmachari’ like Shiva-Parvati in the world today.

13. Not even a single temple of Shri Krishna is found as per the names of the forms of God mentioned in the Gita, but Mahadev’s temples are certainly found. If Shri Krishna is the one who gives the knowledge of the Gita, how were such temples of Mahadev built?.............. Click to view temple name

Who is God of the Gita ?